Regarding the impact of the fuel tax, there are different views in the industry. Some people think that the fuel tax will replace road maintenance fees and highway construction funds (customs and freight management fees, passenger and freight surcharges) and will reduce the burden on road transport companies. Others believe that the implementation of fuel tax will greatly increase the operating costs of road transport companies.
How will the implementation of the fuel tax affect the road transport industry? What is the difference between different models? In order to clarify this issue, the reporter selected three types of models based on the multi-party investigation.
The reporter first converted some of the costs that were abolished after the implementation of the fuel tax into the consumption tax of diesel fuel.
Calculate the daily mileage balance based on the fuel consumption of the vehicle. If the daily mileage of the vehicle exceeds this number of kilometers, the operating costs will increase before the implementation of the fuel tax.
First account
Mileage balance points for different vehicles
Conclusion: From small to large, from light to heavy, the balance point of the daily mileage is gradually shifted
The calculation results show that with the increase in the number of seats for passenger cars and the load capacity of trucks, the balance point of the vehicle's daily mileage has shifted gradually, and the trend of trucks has become more apparent.
The balance points for the number of passenger seats with different seats are: 457 km/day for 19 (2 tons), 503 km/day for 37 (4.5 tons), and 558 km/day for 45 (8 tons).
The mileage balance of different tonnage trucks is: 164 km/day for 2 tons, 356 km/day for 5 tons, 534 km/day for 10 tons, and 801 km/day for 30 tons.
Second account
Mileage balance of vehicle under different fuel consumption
Conclusion: The marginal benefit of every 1 liter drop in fuel consumption per 100 kilometers of vehicles
When calculating the vehicle mileage balance point, the fuel consumption has a greater impact on the calculation results. Due to a variety of factors such as fuel consumption and vehicle operating conditions, driver's driving habits, and road conditions, the reporter specifically calculated the impact of different fuel consumption on the vehicle's driving balance.
Based on the baseline fuel consumption of the seven models, the reporter presses two or three liters from top to bottom and selects five to seven fuel consumption levels (for example, the fuel consumption per 100 kilometers for a 19-passenger vehicle is taken as 10 liters, 11 liters, 12 liters, and 13 liters respectively). , 14 liters, 15 liters, 16 liters) are calculated.
The calculation results show that for different models, a one-liter reduction in fuel consumption per hundred kilometers will bring different benefits. For example, for a 19-seat bus, when the fuel consumption per 100 kilometers is increased from 10 to 16 liters, the daily mileage balance point will be changed from 594 kilometers to 371 kilometers. For the 37-passenger bus, when the fuel consumption per 100 kilometers was increased from 21 to 26 liters, the daily mileage was changed from 574 kilometers to 464 kilometers. For 45 passenger cars, when the fuel consumption per 100 kilometers was increased from 28 to 32 liters, the The mileage balance point has changed from 598 kilometers to 523 kilometers. The bigger the car, the less obvious the effect of fuel consumption on the mileage balance point, and the same is true for trucks.
For each additional liter of fuel consumption per hundred kilometers, the benefits to the same model are also different. With the drop in fuel consumption, the increase in efficiency is on the rise. For example, the fuel consumption per hundred kilometers of 19 passenger cars is increased from 11 to 10 litres, and the daily mileage balance point is increased by 54 kilometers. However, the fuel consumption per 100 kilometers is increased from 16 to 15 liters, and the daily mileage balance point is only increased by 28 kilometers.
Third account:
10% reduction in fuel consumption impact on different models
Conclusion: The benefits of a 10% reduction in fuel consumption are directly proportional to the increase in the number of passenger seats and truck load, and the increase in trucks is significantly higher than that of passenger cars.
After adopting some fuel-saving technologies, it is assumed that each vehicle model will save 10% on the original basis and calculate the change in the mileage balance point. The results showed that the daily mileage of the 19 buses increased by 51 kilometers, the number of 37 cars increased by 55 kilometers, the number of 45 cars increased by 62 kilometers, and the increase rate was slow; the daily mileage of 2 tons of trucks increased by 19 kilometers, the car of 5 tons increased by 40 kilometers, and the car was 10 tons. With an increase of 60 kilometers, the 30-ton vehicle increased by 89 kilometers, showing a linear increase. This shows that adopting fuel-efficient technologies will bring more benefits to truck users. The bigger the car, the more obvious the benefits. (This article chart production Chen Hong)
Mileage balance point for 7 models
Note: The road maintenance fee is 200 yuan/month·ton, the highway passenger management fee and surcharge is 55 yuan/month, the highway freight management and surcharge is 60 yuan/month·ton, and the diesel fuel tax is 0.8 yuan/ l; The fuel consumption of the 7 models is the average value determined by the reporter based on the survey results.
Scope Mount Position,Primary Arms Scope Mounts,Pistol Scope Mounts,30Mm Scope Mount Qd
Nantong Dinggo Optical Instrument Co.,Ltd , https://www.miaozhunoptics.com